Best Practices to Address Issues of Excess Aggregate Dust in Nebraska

Project Details
STATE

NE

SOURCE

TRID

START DATE

07/01/19

END DATE

12/31/20

RESEARCHERS

Jiong Hu, Yong-Rak Kim, Temirlan Barissov, Shaya Gholami, Julia Grasley

SPONSORS

Nebraska DOT

KEYWORDS

Aggregates, Best practices, Concrete construction, Dust, Fines (materials), Performance tests, Quality control

Project description

The negative impacts of an excessive amount of dust on concrete performance have been known and reported in different states. The extent and impact of dust on concrete performance, which depends not only on quantity but also on the nature of dust could be complicated. For example, clay coatings showed a more harmful impact on concrete performance compared with carbonates (limestone dust) or stone dust. While clays that weakly adhere to aggregate will be dispersed in the mixing water and could lead to the workability or air entrainment issues, clays that are strongly bonded to the aggregate surface will remain at the aggregate surface after the mixing process and may disrupt the aggregate-paste bond and results in strength and durability issues. The upper limits of aggregate dust (fines) content currently included in most state agencies' specifications are not necessarily sufficient to prevent aggregate issues. This study includes five different types of aggregates, limestone, gravel, dolomite, granite, and quartz, collected from Nebraska, South Dakota, and Wyoming. A comprehensive evaluation of the aggregate dusts was performed using sieve analysis, washing test, sand equivalent test, methylene blue test, and X-ray powder diffraction. Besides the evaluation of fresh, hardened, and durability properties of concrete, advanced tests were used to characterize aggregate-paste bonding inside concrete prepared with different aggregate types and cleanliness. While aggregate collected in this study all appear to meet the current NDOT criteria of coarse aggregate fine content and fine aggregate sand equivalent value, additional test such as methylene blue value could provide more insights into the type of dust on the aggregate surface, especially the coarse aggregate. Modified Methylene blue value (MMBV) could potentially be used to control the coarse aggregate dust. However, future investigation is needed to establish a correlation between MMBV and field concrete performance that can be eventually used to set up criteria for quality control.
TOP